๐น ๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ สฐแตแต๐ฉทโพ โ๊
โณ 240510 โฉฉเผข อ
โซ #ุตูุฑ ู
ููููุงู ุฐุงูุจ ุฅูู ุงูู
ููุฒู ุจุงูู ๐ฏ แฐ
ส @Arab_The8 แชยนยนโฐโท
BY ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ผ.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ผ from ms